Imran Khan has been sentenced under Section 174 of the Election Act 2017. It is crucial to note that the sentence was given in absentia, while according to the law, a sentence in absentia is considered illegal for the accused. (Reference: PLD-2010-Lah-353 & 2011-MLD-378).
Imran Khan and his lawyers were not given a fair chance to be heard before the court made a hasty decision. The higher judiciary of Pakistan has emphasized the need to establish innocence before imposing any sentence. (Reference: 2023 PTD 384 & 2023 PCrLj 01).
Furthermore, according to the Code of Criminal Procedure, after completing the prosecution’s testimony, the accused’s statement is recorded under Section 342, which was not done in the current case.
Considering the legal requirements were not fulfilled during the trial against Imran Khan, the decision can be easily appealed and accepted.
lawyers of Pakistan in Urdu
2024 YLR 1339
PLJ 2023 CrC 1070
Breaking of tooth constitutes Itlaf-i-salahiyyat-i-udw. This offence is punishable under section 336 PPC with Qisas, and if that is not executable under the principles of equality enunciated by Islam, the offender is liable to Arsh
June 5, 2024
No Comments
2 Comments
lawyersofpakistan_user · August 6, 2023 at 4:19 am
Nice
Adv Akbar · August 6, 2023 at 4:20 am
Nice